Skip to main content

Harmon v. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers District 10 AFL-CIO Union Lodge No 66

E.D. Wis.February 27, 2020No. 2:18-cv-00074
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Summary judgment granted in favor of the Union. The court found that the Union did not breach its duty of fair representation in handling Harmon's grievances related to her employment at WRTP.

What This Ruling Means

**Harmon v. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Union** This case involved a civil rights dispute between a worker named Harmon and their union, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers District 10 AFL-CIO Union Lodge No 66. The worker filed a civil rights claim against the union in 2020, though the specific details of what civil rights violation allegedly occurred are not clear from the available information. Unfortunately, the court's final decision and reasoning in this case are not available in the provided information. The outcome remains unknown, and no damages were reported. **What This Means for Workers:** Even with limited details, this case highlights an important principle: workers have civil rights protections that extend to their relationships with unions, not just employers. If workers believe their union has violated their civil rights—whether through discrimination, retaliation, or other unlawful conduct—they may have legal recourse through the courts. This reminds workers that unions, like employers, must follow civil rights laws. Workers should know they can potentially challenge both union and employer actions that violate their fundamental rights, though each situation depends on specific circumstances and applicable laws.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.