Skip to main content

Building Trades United Pension Trust Fund v. DS Property Maintenance and Management LLC

E.D. Wis.March 10, 2022No. 2:21-cv-00178
Plaintiff WinDS Property Maintenance and Management LLC$3,741.78 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Plaintiffs obtained a default judgment against Defendant for failing to pay required ERISA contributions to the Building Trades United Pension Trust Fund. The court awarded $3,741.78 in total damages, comprising $939.78 in unpaid contributions, interest, and liquidated damages, plus $2,802.00 in attorney's fees and costs.

What This Ruling Means

Court Ruling Summary: Building Trades United Pension Trust Fund v. DS Property Maintenance and Management LLC

What Happened

DS Property Maintenance and Management LLC failed to make required payments to the Building Trades United Pension Trust Fund on behalf of its workers. The pension trust fund, which manages retirement benefits for construction workers, sued the company for not contributing money it was legally required to pay.

What the Court Decided

The court ruled in favor of the pension trust fund. Since the company didn't respond to the lawsuit, the judge entered a default judgment against them. The company was ordered to pay $3,741.78 total, which included $939.78 in unpaid contributions plus interest and penalties, and an additional $2,802.00 to cover the trust fund's attorney's fees and legal costs.

Why This Matters for Workers

This case reinforces that employers cannot ignore their legal obligation to contribute to worker pension plans. When companies fail to pay, workers' retirement security is at risk. Courts will hold employers accountable and force them to pay what they owe—plus additional penalties and attorney's fees, making non-compliance costly.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.