Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Civil Rights: Jobs
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
- State
- Wisconsin
- Circuit
- Seventh Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court granted defendant Wal-Mart's motion for summary judgment and denied the EEOC's motion for summary judgment. The court found that Wal-Mart's temporary alternative duty (TAD) program, which was limited to work-related injuries and did not extend to pregnancy-related medical restrictions, was not intentional discrimination under Title VII.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.