Skip to main content

Ellerman, Bradley v. Whitley, John

W.D. Wis.March 7, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00324
Plaintiff WinLexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc.$17,849.25 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

Plaintiffs prevailed on their motion to compel discovery and were awarded reasonable attorneys' fees of $17,849.25 (10% reduction from requested $19,832.50) for drafting the motion to compel and reply.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Awards Attorney Fees in Employment Dispute Against LexisNexis** Bradley Ellerman filed an employment lawsuit against his former employer, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc., and supervisor John Whitley. During the legal process, Ellerman's lawyers had to ask the court to force the defendants to properly respond to requests for information and documents needed for the case. The court sided with Ellerman and ordered LexisNexis to provide the requested discovery materials. Ellerman then asked the court to make the company pay his attorney fees for having to file the motion to compel discovery. The court agreed and awarded $17,849.25 in attorney fees, which was slightly less than the $19,832.50 originally requested. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling shows that when employers don't cooperate during employment lawsuits by refusing to provide required documents or information, they may have to pay the worker's legal costs on top of any other damages. This financial consequence helps ensure employers can't simply stonewall legitimate legal cases by making litigation unnecessarily expensive for workers. It also demonstrates that courts will hold companies accountable when they fail to follow proper legal procedures during employment disputes.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.