Skip to main content

Santiago v. Cuisine By Claudette, LLC

E.D.N.Y.November 7, 2024No. 1:23-cv-02675
Plaintiff WinOld Bailey Corp.$21,600 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Court granted plaintiff's motion for default judgment against defendants for unauthorized broadcast of boxing match program in violation of 47 U.S.C. § 605, awarding statutory damages of $21,600 plus attorneys' fees to be determined.

What This Ruling Means

**Santiago v. Cuisine By Claudette, LLC - Court Ruling Summary** This case involved a dispute over the unauthorized broadcasting of a boxing match at a restaurant. Santiago, who appears to hold rights to the boxing program, sued Cuisine By Claudette (operated by Old Bailey Corp.) for showing the match without proper authorization. This violated federal law that protects against the unauthorized interception and use of cable or satellite programming. The court ruled in favor of Santiago after the restaurant failed to respond to the lawsuit (called a "default judgment"). The judge awarded Santiago $21,600 in statutory damages under federal communications law, plus attorney's fees that will be determined later. **Why This Matters for Workers:** While this case isn't directly about worker rights, it shows how businesses can face significant financial penalties for violating federal laws. For restaurant and hospitality workers, this highlights the importance of understanding that employers must follow various federal regulations in their operations. When employers cut corners or ignore legal requirements - whether related to broadcasting rights, wage laws, or workplace safety - they can face costly consequences. Workers should be aware that there are legal protections in place across many areas of business operations, and violations can result in substantial penalties for employers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.