Skip to main content

Calzada v. Neiman Marcus Group, LLC

W.D.N.C.November 13, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00494
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationWrongful TerminationHarassment

Outcome

The court granted defendant's motion to compel arbitration and stayed the litigation, requiring the plaintiff's employment discrimination claims to be resolved through binding arbitration rather than court proceedings.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.