PAYTON-FERNANDEZ v. BURLINGTON STORES, INC.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- New Jersey
- Circuit
- Third Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court approved a $5.2 million FLSA settlement on behalf of 828 opt-in collective members who were misclassified as exempt Assistant Store Managers and denied overtime wages. Settlement was calculated based on day-to-day time records with pro-rata distribution among participating collective members.
What This Ruling Means
Payton-Fernandez v. Burlington Stores, Inc.
What Happened
Over 800 workers at Burlington Stores claimed the company illegally classified them as "Assistant Store Managers" to avoid paying overtime wages. These employees said they performed regular hourly work but were labeled as management to escape federal overtime rules.
What the Court Decided
A court approved a $5.2 million settlement for 828 employees who joined the lawsuit. The company must distribute this money based on individual time records, ensuring each worker receives a fair share of compensation for unpaid overtime hours.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that job titles don't determine whether someone deserves overtime pay. If you perform hourly work—regardless of your title—you may be entitled to extra pay for hours over 40 per week. Employers cannot simply call workers "managers" to dodge overtime obligations. The substantial settlement signals that misclassification violations carry serious financial consequences for companies, encouraging better compliance with wage laws.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.