Skip to main content

Trustees Of The Laborers Trust Fund v. LCM Corporation

W.D. Va.January 2, 2025No. 7:23-cv-00821
Plaintiff WinLCM Corporation$605,130.98 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Default judgment granted against defendant Musgrove for breach of settlement agreement. Court awarded plaintiffs $605,130.98 in damages consisting of principal ($589,145.51), pre-judgment interest ($9,692.97), and attorneys' fees and costs ($5,542.50), plus post-judgment interest.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Trust Fund vs. LCM Corporation: ERISA Violation Case** This case involved a dispute between the Trustees of the Laborers Trust Fund and LCM Corporation over violations of ERISA, the federal law that protects worker benefit plans. The trust fund, which likely manages benefits like pensions or health insurance for laborers, brought legal action against LCM Corporation for failing to meet their obligations under ERISA rules. Unfortunately, the available court records don't provide enough detail to determine what specific ERISA violations occurred or how the court ultimately resolved the case. The outcome is listed as "unresolvable" in the records, and no damages are reported, making it unclear whether workers were compensated or if the employer was required to correct any violations. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights the ongoing enforcement of ERISA, which is crucial for protecting worker benefits. Even though we can't see the specific outcome here, ERISA cases like this demonstrate that trust funds actively monitor employers to ensure they properly contribute to and manage worker benefit programs. Workers should know that legal mechanisms exist to hold employers accountable when they fail to meet their benefit obligations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.