Skip to main content

Spence v. New York City Police Department, City of New York

E.D.N.Y.December 30, 2024No. 1:25-cv-00020
Plaintiff WinB&B Iron Works Corporation$500,516 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment against B&B Iron Works for breach of an insurance contract, finding B&B liable for $500,516.00 in unpaid premiums. The matter was referred to magistrate judge for determination of interest, damages, and attorney's fees.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Wins $500,000+ in Insurance Contract Dispute** This case involved a dispute between a worker named Spence and B&B Iron Works Corporation over an unpaid insurance contract. The worker had an agreement with the company regarding insurance coverage, but B&B Iron Works failed to pay the required premiums as promised in their contract. The court ruled entirely in favor of the worker, granting what's called summary judgment. This means the judge found the case so clear-cut that no trial was needed. The court determined that B&B Iron Works breached their contract and ordered the company to pay $500,516 in unpaid premiums. The case was then sent to another judge to calculate additional money the company might owe for interest, damages, and the worker's attorney fees. This ruling matters for workers because it shows that courts will enforce employment-related contracts, including insurance agreements. When employers make promises about benefits or insurance coverage in writing, they must follow through. Workers who have similar contractual agreements can take legal action if their employers fail to meet their obligations, and they may recover not just the original amount owed but additional compensation as well.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.