Kim v. J & J Safetymate Corp.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- bench trial
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff prevailed on New York Labor Law wage claims in bench trial. Court awarded $147,577.87 in damages including compensatory damages, liquidated damages, statutory damages, and prejudgment interest. Plaintiff now seeks attorneys' fees.
What This Ruling Means
Kim v. J & J Safetymate Corp. - What You Need to Know
What Happened
Kim filed a lawsuit against J & J Safetymate Corp. claiming the company failed to pay wages owed. The case went to trial in federal court in New York, where a judge heard evidence from both sides.
The Court's Decision
The judge ruled in Kim's favor, finding that the company violated New York labor laws by not paying wages properly. The court ordered the company to pay Kim $147,577.87 in total damages. This included compensation for unpaid wages, extra penalties the law requires, and interest that accumulated while the case was pending. Kim's lawyer is now asking the court to also pay their legal fees from the company.
Why This Matters
This case demonstrates that courts take wage theft seriously. Employers cannot simply refuse to pay workers what they've earned. If you believe your employer owes you unpaid wages, this ruling shows the legal system can hold companies accountable and award significant damages—potentially helping cover not just lost pay, but additional penalties and costs.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.