Skip to main content

Sam Benford v. Studio Occam LLC

C.D. Cal.January 3, 2025No. 2:24-cv-10890
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Court granted plaintiffs' amended motion for default judgment against defendants Elite Terrazzo Flooring, Inc. and Picnic Worldwide LLC, awarding total relief of $465,088.81 including unpaid contributions, interest, liquidated damages, and attorneys' fees, with defendants found jointly and severally liable as alter egos.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Wins $465,000 in Employment Law Case Against Two Companies** Sam Benford sued two companies, Elite Terrazzo Flooring, Inc. and Picnic Worldwide LLC, over unpaid employment contributions. The case involved money that the companies owed but failed to pay, likely related to benefits, wages, or required employer contributions to funds like retirement or health insurance. The court ruled in favor of Benford and awarded him $465,088.81. This amount included the original unpaid money, interest that built up over time, additional penalty damages, and attorney fees. Importantly, the court found that both companies were essentially the same business operating under different names (called "alter egos"), meaning both companies are responsible for paying the full amount. This ruling matters for workers because it shows courts will hold employers accountable when they try to avoid paying what they owe by hiding behind multiple business names. When companies don't pay required contributions or wages, workers can pursue legal action and potentially recover not just the original amount, but also interest and penalties. The case also demonstrates that employers cannot easily escape responsibility by shifting operations between related companies.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.