Keith Herman v. MetalTek International, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- Ohio
- Circuit
- Sixth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court approved a class action settlement under the Fair Labor Standards Act and Ohio wage-and-hour statutes. MetalTek agreed to pay $142,900.35 in total settlement funds, including $82,738.15 in unpaid overtime compensation to 57 class members, a $5,000 service award to the plaintiff, and attorneys' fees and administrative costs.
What This Ruling Means
MetalTek International Wage Theft Settlement
What Happened
Keith Herman and 56 other workers sued MetalTek International, claiming the company failed to pay them overtime compensation they had earned. This type of case—where employees believe they weren't properly paid for extra hours worked—is called wage theft.
What the Court Decided
A federal court approved a settlement requiring MetalTek to pay $142,900.35 total. This money covered $82,738.15 in unpaid overtime wages owed to the 57 workers involved in the case, plus a $5,000 award to Herman for bringing the lawsuit, and legal fees.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that employees have legal protections when employers fail to pay overtime wages. If you believe your employer owes you unpaid overtime, you may have the right to file a claim. Class action settlements like this allow groups of workers to recover lost wages together, making it easier for individual employees to challenge wage violations without bearing the full cost of a lawsuit themselves.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.