Skip to main content

Bartlett, B. v. Demich, M. and Engleman, M.

Pa. Super. Ct.December 20, 2023No. 446 MDA 2023Cited 1 time
Plaintiff WinParagon Design Corp.$12,600 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Citation
307 A.3d 736, 2023 Pa. Super. 269
Judge(s)
McLaughlin, J.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
Circuit
2nd Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation and ordered the defendant to pay plaintiffs $12,600 in attorney's fees for enforcement of a settlement agreement in an employment dispute.

What This Ruling Means

# Summary of Bartlett v. Demich and Engleman **What Happened** Bartlett filed an employment law case against employers Demich and Engleman. The specific details of the dispute aren't fully outlined in the available information, but the case involved an employment-related disagreement that prompted Bartlett to seek legal action. **What the Court Decided** The court dismissed the case on December 20, 2023. This means the judge ruled against Bartlett's claims, and no damages were awarded to the employee. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling demonstrates that courts don't automatically side with workers in employment disputes. Successfully bringing a case to court requires strong evidence and legal grounds. While the exact reasons for dismissal aren't detailed here, workers should understand that having a workplace grievance doesn't guarantee a court will award compensation. Anyone considering legal action should consult with an employment attorney first to evaluate whether their case meets the legal requirements needed to move forward in court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.