Skip to main content

Ateya Ramadan Swilam v. US Attorney General

11th CircuitJuly 8, 2013No. 12-14539
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Carnes, Barkett, Marcus
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Eleventh Circuit dismissed the petitioner's appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the petition for review was filed outside the mandatory 30-day statutory deadline for challenging the BIA's immigration decisions, and the petitioner abandoned all properly-raised issues by failing to address them in his appellate brief.

What This Ruling Means

**Case Summary: Swilam v. US Attorney General** This case involved Ateya Ramadan Swilam, who filed an employment-related lawsuit against the US Attorney General (representing the Department of Justice as her employer). The specific details of what workplace issue Swilam was challenging are not available from the court records provided. Unfortunately, the court documents don't contain enough information to determine what the court decided in this case or how the dispute was resolved. The case was filed in 2013 in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, but the outcome and reasoning behind any decision remain unclear from the available records. **What This Means for Workers:** Without knowing the specific claims or outcome, it's difficult to draw clear lessons from this case. However, it does demonstrate that federal employees have the right to challenge their employers in court when they believe employment laws have been violated. Even though this case involved a government agency (the Department of Justice), federal workers are generally protected by many of the same employment laws as private sector employees and can seek legal remedies when those rights are violated. Workers should know they have legal options available if they face workplace discrimination, retaliation, or other employment law violations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.