Skip to main content

Whitfield v. City of New York

S.D.N.Y.January 29, 2025No. 1:20-cv-04674
SettlementParkchester Department of Public Safety LLC$703,527.83 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court approved a class action settlement providing $703,527.83 total ($428,660.56 to class members) for wage and hour violations. All 176 class members receive individual payments based on weeks worked, with no opt-outs or objections.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Approves Large Settlement for Security Workers' Unpaid Wages** This case involved 176 security workers employed by Parkchester Department of Public Safety LLC who claimed their employer violated wage and hour laws. The workers alleged they weren't paid properly for all the hours they worked, which is commonly called wage theft. The court approved a class action settlement totaling over $703,000. Of this amount, $428,660 will go directly to the 176 workers, with each person receiving an individual payment based on how many weeks they worked for the company. The remaining money covers legal fees and court costs. Notably, none of the workers objected to the settlement terms or chose to opt out, suggesting they found the agreement fair. This case shows that workers can successfully band together to recover stolen wages through class action lawsuits. When employers fail to pay workers properly, the courts can order significant financial compensation. The case demonstrates that even if individual workers might not have large claims on their own, joining together as a group can lead to meaningful recovery of unpaid wages and send a message to employers about following wage laws.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.