Skip to main content

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0480

Unknown CourtFebruary 5, 2025
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Attorney General opinion (advisory)

Related Laws

erisa

Outcome

Texas Attorney General opinion addressing whether provisions of HB 1763 and HB 1919 regulating pharmacy contracts and referral practices are preempted by ERISA and enforceable against out-of-state health benefit plan issuers and pharmacy benefit managers.

Excerpt

Enacted by House Bill 1763 and House Bill 1919, subchapter M and subchapter L of chapter 1369 of the Texas Insurance Code regulate certain contracts with pharmacists and pharmacies and certain referral and solicitation practices concerning affiliated providers. This opinion addresses whether any of the provisions are preempted by ERISA and whether they are enforceable against health benefit plan issuers or pharmacy benefit managers administering a health benefit plan domiciled outside of Texas.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** The Texas Attorney General was asked to review two state laws (House Bills 1763 and 1919) that regulate how pharmacy benefit managers and health insurance companies handle contracts with pharmacies and referral practices. The question was whether these Texas laws could actually be enforced, or if they would be blocked by federal ERISA law, which governs many employee benefit plans. There was also a question about whether the laws could apply to insurance companies and pharmacy managers based outside of Texas. **What the Court Decided:** This was an attorney general opinion, not a court ruling. The opinion addressed whether the federal ERISA law would prevent Texas from enforcing its pharmacy regulation laws and whether Texas could regulate out-of-state companies managing employee health benefits. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This opinion affects workers with employer-sponsored health insurance who use prescription medications. If Texas laws can regulate pharmacy benefit managers, it could mean better protections for patients, including potentially lower drug costs and more pharmacy choices. However, if federal ERISA law blocks these protections, workers might have fewer safeguards against restrictive pharmacy networks or unfavorable prescription drug policies managed by their employer's health plan.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.