Skip to main content

Bento v. Concrete USA, Inc.

S.D. Fla.January 21, 2025No. 0:24-cv-60267
SettlementXing Yue Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The parties resolved the Fair Labor Standards Act case through an accepted Rule 68 Offer of Judgment. The court directed entry of judgment on the agreed terms, with each party bearing their own fees and costs except as specified in the offer.

What This Ruling Means

**Wage Theft Case Settles Between Worker and Construction Company** A worker named Bento filed a lawsuit against Concrete USA, Inc. (operated by Xing Yue Inc.) claiming the company failed to pay proper wages. The case involved allegations of wage theft, meaning the employer allegedly didn't pay the worker all the money they were legally owed for their work. The court case ended when both sides reached a settlement agreement. The parties used a legal procedure called an "Offer of Judgment," where one side makes a formal settlement offer that the other side accepts. The court then approved this agreement and officially closed the case. The specific amount of money involved in the settlement was not made public. This case matters for workers because it shows that employees can take legal action when they believe their employer hasn't paid them properly. Even though this particular case settled rather than going to trial, it demonstrates that workers have options when facing wage theft. The settlement suggests the employer was willing to resolve the dispute rather than continue fighting in court. Workers who suspect they're not being paid correctly should know they may have legal rights and remedies available to recover unpaid wages.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.