Skip to main content

DAMIANA ROSARIO AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF JOSEFINA BENITEZ, ZION BRERETON, ALICIA LEARMONT, JAMES CHOI AND ANDREYA CRAWFORD, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Valentino U.S.A., Inc.

S.D.N.Y.February 20, 2025No. 1:19-cv-11463
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The case was settled in principle. The court issued an order requiring parties to either consent to magistrate judge proceedings, submit a voluntary dismissal, or provide a joint letter with settlement details for court approval by December 20, 2021.

What This Ruling Means

**Workers Settle Wage Theft Case Against Restaurant Company** This case involved restaurant workers who claimed their employer, Black Rose Hospitality LLC (doing business as Valentino U.S.A., Inc.), failed to pay them proper wages. The workers filed a class action lawsuit, meaning they sued on behalf of themselves and other employees who faced similar problems with unpaid wages. The court decided to approve a settlement agreement between the workers and the restaurant company. While the specific dollar amount of the settlement wasn't disclosed in public court records, the parties reached an agreement to resolve the wage theft claims without going to trial. The court required the parties to submit details of their settlement for official approval. This case matters for workers because it shows that employees can band together to fight wage theft through class action lawsuits. When restaurants or other employers fail to pay proper wages, workers have legal options to recover what they're owed. Even though this case settled rather than going to trial, it demonstrates that employers may face significant legal consequences when they don't follow wage and hour laws. Workers facing similar issues should know they have rights and can seek legal help to recover unpaid wages.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.