Harris v. F. Schumacher & Co., LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The parties settled a Fair Labor Standards Act claim. The court approved the settlement as fair and reasonable, including attorney's fees of $16,507.00 and costs of $477.00. The case was dismissed with prejudice.
What This Ruling Means
Harris v. F. Schumacher & Co., LLC Settlement Summary
What Happened
An employee named Harris filed a lawsuit against F. Schumacher & Co., LLC, claiming the company violated federal wage laws by not properly paying workers. The dispute involved whether the employer had followed the Fair Labor Standards Act, which sets rules about minimum wage and overtime pay.
What the Court Decided
The two sides reached a settlement agreement before trial. A judge reviewed the deal and determined it was fair and reasonable for both parties. As part of the settlement, the company agreed to pay $16,507 in attorney's fees and $477 in court costs. The case was officially closed with a "dismissed with prejudice" ruling, meaning Harris cannot file the same claim again.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that courts take wage-related violations seriously and will approve settlements that compensate workers and their lawyers. When employers fail to pay workers correctly, employees can pursue legal action to recover lost wages and related costs. Settlements like this one encourage employers to follow wage laws and give workers a path to recover money they're rightfully owed.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.