Skip to main content

Stotesbery v. Muy Pizza-Tejas, LLC

D. Minn.February 26, 2025No. 0:22-cv-01622
SettlementMUY Pizza-Tejas, LLC$4,500,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court approved settlement of collective action wage/hour claims against pizza delivery company. Plaintiff and class members received settlement fund totaling $4.5 million (inferred from one-third attorney fee of $1.5M), with additional service awards and cost reimbursements approved.

What This Ruling Means

Stotesbery v. Muy Pizza-Tejas, LLC: Court Settlement Summary

What Happened

Employees at Muy Pizza-Tejas, LLC, a pizza delivery company, sued their employer for wage theft—meaning the company didn't pay workers all the money they were legally owed. Multiple workers joined together in this case to pursue their claims as a group.

What the Court Decided

A court approved a settlement worth $4.5 million to be distributed among the affected workers. The company agreed to pay this amount to resolve the wage theft claims without admitting wrongdoing. Workers also received additional payments to cover costs and service awards for those who helped represent the group.

Why This Matters for Workers

This case shows that workers can band together to challenge companies that underpay them—and win significant compensation. Even large settlements like this one demonstrate that employers may face serious financial consequences for wage violations. For pizza delivery workers and other employees in similar industries, this ruling reinforces that wage theft claims can be successful and that workers have legal protections when companies fail to pay proper wages.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Stotesbery from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.