Chen v. L & H Wine & Liquor, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- bench trial
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff prevailed at bench trial on Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law wage and overtime claims. The court awarded unpaid wages, pre-judgment interest, attorneys' fees, and costs.
What This Ruling Means
Chen v. L & H Wine & Liquor, Inc.
What Happened
Chen worked at L & H Wine and Liquor, Inc. and filed a lawsuit claiming the company failed to pay wages owed and wrongfully terminated his employment.
What the Court Decided
A federal judge in New York ruled in Chen's favor. The court found that L & H Wine and Liquor violated federal wage laws and New York state labor laws by not properly paying Chen for his work and overtime hours. The judge ordered the company to pay Chen $75,132.50 in damages. This amount covered unpaid wages, interest on those wages, attorney's fees, and court costs.
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling reinforces that employers must follow wage and overtime laws—they cannot simply refuse to pay workers what they've earned. Workers who believe their employer has withheld pay have legal rights and can take legal action to recover what they're owed, including interest and lawyer fees. The court's decision shows these laws have real consequences for employers who break them.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Chen from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.