Skip to main content

Lewis v. New York State Office for People with Developmental Disabilities

S.D.N.Y.March 10, 2025No. 1:25-cv-01136
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
445 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The parties reached a settlement in principle in this FLSA and New York Labor Law wage-and-hour case. The court ordered submission of the settlement agreement by September 15, 2023, for judicial approval under the applicable fairness standards.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Wins Wage Theft Settlement Against State Agency** This case involved a worker named Lewis who claimed that the New York State Office for People with Developmental Disabilities failed to pay proper wages. Lewis filed a lawsuit alleging wage theft violations under both federal labor law (the Fair Labor Standards Act) and New York state labor law. The worker argued that the employer had not followed legal requirements for paying wages and overtime. The court case ended when both sides reached a settlement agreement. This means Lewis and the state agency agreed to resolve the dispute without going to trial. The court required the parties to submit their settlement terms by September 15, 2023, so a judge could review and approve the agreement to ensure it was fair to the worker. This case matters for workers because it shows that even government employers must follow wage and hour laws. Workers have the right to proper pay under both federal and state laws, and they can take legal action when employers fail to meet these obligations. When workers win or settle wage theft cases, it sends a message that employers will be held accountable for paying what they legally owe.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.