Gayhart v. Northampton Restaurants, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- Virginia
- Circuit
- Fourth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court approved a settlement agreement in which the employer agreed to pay the plaintiff $10,400 for unpaid wages and liquidated damages, plus $7,600 in attorney's fees, resolving the FLSA tip theft and wage dispute.
What This Ruling Means
Gayhart v. Northampton Restaurants, Inc. - Settlement Summary
What Happened
An employee at Northampton Restaurants, Inc. filed a lawsuit claiming the company failed to pay wages owed, specifically involving improper handling of tip money. This type of dispute—where employers misuse or fail to properly distribute tips—is a common wage theft problem in the restaurant industry.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement agreement requiring the restaurant to pay the employee $10,400 in unpaid wages and additional damages. The employer also paid $7,600 to cover the employee's attorney fees. This settlement resolved the dispute without going to trial.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case demonstrates that employees can successfully challenge wage theft in court and recover money owed to them. The fact that the employer had to pay attorney fees is particularly important—it means workers don't have to pay lawyers out-of-pocket when pursuing legitimate wage claims. If you believe your employer has stolen your wages or tips, this ruling shows the legal system can hold employers accountable.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.