Shustarich v. Northern Belt & Conveyor, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- Minnesota
- Circuit
- Eighth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The parties settled a Fair Labor Standards Act wage-and-hour dispute. Plaintiff received $5,000 total ($3,000 directly and $2,000 in attorney fees), and all claims were dismissed with prejudice.
What This Ruling Means
Shustarich v. Northern Belt & Conveyor, Inc. — Case Summary
What Happened
An employee filed a lawsuit against Northern Belt & Conveyor, Inc. claiming the company failed to pay wages owed, wrongfully fired them, and broke their employment contract.
What the Court Decided
The case settled before trial. The employee received $5,000 total: $3,000 as compensation for unpaid wages and $2,000 to cover their attorney's fees. All claims were dismissed permanently, meaning neither side can bring these issues back to court later.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that workers can successfully challenge employers who don't pay them properly. The company had to cover not only the missing wages but also the employee's legal costs—adding real financial consequences for wage violations. The settlement demonstrates that workers have legal rights under federal wage laws and can recover money owed to them, even when disputes are resolved outside of court. If you believe your employer has withheld pay unfairly, this case illustrates that pursuing legal action may help recover what you're owed.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.