Skip to main content

McKeown v. Paycom Payroll LLC

W.D. Okla.March 31, 2025No. 5:24-cv-00301
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The court reversed and remanded the ALJ's decision denying disability benefits because the ALJ failed to properly address employer performance reports when reassessing credibility, repeating the same errors identified in the prior appeal.

What This Ruling Means

**McKeown v. Paycom Payroll LLC: Court Orders New Review of Disability Benefits Case** This case involved a worker who was denied disability benefits after working at Paycom Payroll LLC. The worker had applied for benefits, but an administrative law judge (ALJ) rejected the claim. The worker appealed this decision to a higher court. **What the Court Decided:** The court sided with the worker and sent the case back for a new review. The court found that the judge who denied the benefits made significant errors. Specifically, the judge failed to properly consider the worker's job performance reports from Paycom when deciding whether to believe the worker's claims about their disability. Even more concerning, the judge repeated the same mistakes that had been identified in an earlier appeal of this case. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling reinforces that when reviewing disability claims, judges must thoroughly examine all relevant evidence, including workplace performance records. Workers can take some comfort knowing that if administrative judges don't properly consider important evidence from their employers, higher courts will step in and order a fair review. This case shows the appeals process can work to protect workers' rights to have their disability claims properly evaluated.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.