Skip to main content

Policarpio v. Yorkville Deli Market Corp.

S.D.N.Y.April 3, 2025No. 1:23-cv-10759
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court denied the defendant's motion to file a partially redacted settlement agreement, requiring full disclosure of all settlement terms including payment amounts on the public docket by October 31, 2023, in accordance with FLSA legislative purposes and the strong presumption favoring public access to judicial records.

What This Ruling Means

**Policarpio v. Yorkville Deli Market Corp. - Court Ruling Summary** This case involved a wage theft dispute where a worker sued their employer for allegedly not paying proper wages under federal labor laws. The specific details of the wage violations were not disclosed in the available information. The court made an important decision about transparency in employment settlements. When the employer tried to keep parts of their settlement agreement secret by filing a partially redacted (blacked-out) version, the court said no. The judge ruled that the complete settlement agreement, including all payment amounts, must be made public on the court record by October 31, 2023. The court explained that federal wage and hour laws are designed to protect all workers, and keeping settlement details secret would undermine this purpose. The judge emphasized that court records should generally be open to the public. **Why this matters for workers:** This ruling supports transparency in workplace disputes. When employers settle wage theft cases, other workers can see the outcomes, which helps them understand their rights and what similar violations might be worth. Public settlements also create accountability for employers and can deter future wage theft by making consequences visible to the community.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.