Skip to main content

Talavera v. 987 Supermarket Inc.

S.D.N.Y.May 7, 2025No. 1:24-cv-03089
Settlement987 Supermarket Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The parties reached a settlement agreement on all issues in this FLSA wage-and-hour collective action. The Court ordered that any dismissal with prejudice requires approval by the Court or Department of Labor, with a June 9, 2025 deadline for submission of the settlement agreement and supporting documentation.

What This Ruling Means

Talavera v. 987 Supermarket Inc. Settlement Summary

What Happened

Workers at 987 Supermarket Inc. filed a lawsuit claiming the company stole their wages by not paying them fairly under federal law. This was a group case involving multiple employees facing the same wage problems.

What the Court Decided

The two sides reached a settlement agreement to resolve the dispute. Instead of going to trial, the company and workers agreed to settle. The court required that any final dismissal of the case be approved by either the court itself or the Department of Labor. The parties had until June 9, 2025 to file their settlement agreement with the court for approval.

Why This Matters

This case shows that workers can band together to challenge wage theft. When companies allegedly fail to pay workers properly, employees have legal options through collective lawsuits. The court's requirement for official approval of settlements protects workers by ensuring agreements are fair before being finalized. While no specific damages were reported publicly, this settlement likely provided compensation to affected workers for unpaid wages.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.