Skip to main content

Crews v. Buckman Laboratories International, Inc.

Tenn.May 24, 2002No. W2000-01834-SC-R11-CVCited 219 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Justice William M. Barker
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationWrongful Termination

Outcome

The Tennessee Supreme Court reversed the lower courts' dismissal of an in-house counsel's retaliatory discharge claim, holding that in-house counsel may bring a common-law action for retaliatory discharge when terminated for reporting unauthorized practice of law in compliance with professional ethics rules. The case was remanded for further proceedings.

What This Ruling Means

Based on the limited information provided, I cannot provide a complete summary of the Crews v. Buckman Laboratories International case from Tennessee in 2002. The excerpt and key details about what happened in the dispute, the court's decision, and the specific employment law issues involved are not included in the information given. What we know is that this was an employment law case filed in Tennessee on May 24, 2002, involving a worker (Crews) and Buckman Laboratories International, Inc. However, without the case excerpt or details about the specific claims, court ruling, or legal reasoning, it's impossible to explain what the dispute was about or how the court decided. For workers, employment law cases generally matter because they help establish workplace rights and protections, but without knowing the specifics of this case - such as whether it involved discrimination, wrongful termination, wage issues, or other employment matters - I cannot provide meaningful guidance about what this particular ruling means for workers' rights or workplace protections. To properly understand this case's impact, you would need access to the full court decision or case details.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.