Skip to main content

Connolly v. Lanham

D. Md.July 17, 2025No. 1:22-cv-02048
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
443 Civil Rights: Accomodations
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The claims of plaintiff Ignacio Osorio-Cruz were dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1) because no motion for substitution was filed within 90 days after service of the notice of death. The action continues with Marisol Gomez as the sole named plaintiff.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved wage theft claims against J. Jacobo Farm Labor Contractor, Inc. Two workers, Ignacio Osorio-Cruz and Marisol Gomez, filed a lawsuit claiming the farm labor contractor failed to pay them proper wages. However, during the legal proceedings, Mr. Osorio-Cruz died. Under court rules, when someone dies during a lawsuit, their family or estate must file paperwork within 90 days to continue the case on their behalf. **What the Court Decided** The court dismissed Mr. Osorio-Cruz's portion of the case because no one filed the required paperwork within the 90-day deadline after his death was reported to the court. The lawsuit continues with only Ms. Gomez as the remaining plaintiff pursuing her wage theft claims against the farm labor contractor. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights an important but often overlooked aspect of employment lawsuits: timing requirements don't stop when someone dies. If a worker dies while pursuing wage theft or other employment claims, their family or estate must act quickly to keep the case alive. Workers and their families should understand these strict deadlines and consider getting legal help to ensure claims aren't lost due to procedural requirements.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.