Skip to main content

Ramirez v. City of Texas City

S.D. Tex.July 18, 2025No. 3:23-cv-00356
Mixed ResultLucero Ag Services, Inc.$500 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Texas

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

Court recommended awarding reduced attorney fees of $500 (rather than $1,345 requested) and ordering defendants to produce documents as a purge condition to avoid civil contempt sanctions for failing to comply with subpoenas.

What This Ruling Means

**Ramirez v. City of Texas City: Court Orders Employer to Produce Documents** This case involved a wage theft dispute where a worker sued Lucero Ag Services, Inc. for allegedly not paying proper wages. The worker's attorney needed certain documents from the company to prove their case, so the court ordered the employer to turn over these documents through legal requests called subpoenas. The employer failed to provide the required documents as ordered by the court. Because of this non-compliance, the court issued a "show cause" order, essentially telling the company to explain why they shouldn't be punished for ignoring court orders. The court also recommended awarding $500 in attorney fees against the employer and said they could avoid further penalties by finally producing the documents. The case is still pending a final decision from the district judge. This case shows that courts take document requests seriously in employment disputes. When employers refuse to provide evidence that workers need to prove wage theft or other violations, courts can impose financial penalties and other consequences. Workers should know that the legal system has tools to force uncooperative employers to turn over important documents needed to prove their cases.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.