Skip to main content

Perry v. Hardeman County Goverment

W.D. Tenn.July 22, 2025No. 1:19-cv-01106
SettlementSwinerton Builders$2,300,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court approved a consent decree between the United States and Swinerton Builders resolving alleged Clean Water Act violations at solar energy construction sites. The settlement includes $2.3 million in civil penalties and $600,000 in environmental mitigation commitments.

What This Ruling Means

**Perry v. Hardeman County Government - Court Settlement** This case involved alleged violations of the Clean Water Act at solar energy construction sites operated by Swinerton Builders. The United States government brought claims against the company for failing to properly manage stormwater and prevent pollution during construction projects. The court approved a settlement agreement between the government and Swinerton Builders. Under this consent decree, the company agreed to pay $2.3 million in civil penalties for the environmental violations. Additionally, Swinerton committed to spending $600,000 on environmental mitigation efforts to address the harm caused by their construction practices. This settlement matters for workers because it demonstrates how environmental compliance failures can result in significant financial consequences for employers. When companies face large penalties like this $2.3 million payment, it can impact their financial stability, potentially affecting job security and resources available for worker safety programs. The case also highlights the importance of proper environmental training and safety protocols at construction sites. Workers should be aware that environmental violations can be serious legal matters that affect their employers, and they may want to ensure they receive adequate training on environmental compliance requirements at their job sites.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.