Skip to main content

Dennis Cooper v. The Professional Management Plus Team

C.D. Cal.July 29, 2025No. 5:25-cv-01353
Defendant WinThe Professional Management Plus Team$2,240,483.35 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court granted default judgment against defendants F-5 Ventures, Inc., Gregory Robbins, and Shannon Robbins in favor of SouthState Bank for breach of contract, awarding over $2.2 million in damages plus attorney fees.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved a breach of contract dispute, though the details about Dennis Cooper's specific role and claims are not clear from the available information. The case ended up in court between multiple parties including F-5 Ventures, Inc., Gregory and Shannon Robbins, and SouthState Bank, with The Professional Management Plus Team as Cooper's employer. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled against the defendants (F-5 Ventures and the Robbins) and awarded SouthState Bank over $2.2 million in damages plus attorney fees. This was a "default judgment," which means the defendants failed to respond to the lawsuit or appear in court to defend themselves. When this happens, the court automatically rules in favor of the plaintiff. **Why This Matters for Workers** While this case primarily involved a business contract dispute rather than typical employment issues, it shows how expensive legal battles can become when contracts are broken. For workers, this highlights the importance of understanding any contracts you sign with employers and the potential financial consequences when agreements aren't honored. Default judgments also demonstrate why it's crucial to respond to legal proceedings rather than ignoring them.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.