Skip to main content

Hitt v. MHM Support Services

E.D. Mo.July 31, 2025No. 4:23-cv-01277
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss all of plaintiff's claims. The 2019 failure-to-promote claim was time-barred under the 300-day ADEA filing deadline, and the 2021 failure-to-promote claim was barred by the doctrine of claim splitting due to the prior state court action.

What This Ruling Means

**Hitt v. MHM Support Services: Court Dismisses Age Discrimination Claims** This case involved a worker who sued Chicago Public Schools and MHM Support Services, claiming they were passed over for promotions because of their age. The employee filed discrimination claims related to two separate promotion decisions - one from 2019 and another from 2021. The court dismissed all of the worker's claims without considering the merits. For the 2019 promotion claim, the court ruled that too much time had passed - federal age discrimination laws require workers to file complaints within 300 days of the alleged discrimination. The employee had waited too long to bring this claim. For the 2021 promotion claim, the court found that the worker had already filed a related lawsuit in state court, and federal rules prevent splitting similar claims across multiple lawsuits. **What this means for workers:** This case highlights two critical timing rules. First, if you believe you've faced age discrimination at work, you must act quickly - you generally have less than a year to file a federal complaint. Second, if you're considering legal action, work with an attorney to ensure all related claims are filed together in the appropriate court to avoid having your case thrown out on procedural grounds.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.