Stavola v. Macro Digital Technology Corp.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- motion to compel
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff prevailed on his motion to compel discovery and was awarded reasonable attorneys' fees of $10,038.00 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, though his request for costs was denied.
What This Ruling Means
Stavola v. Macro Digital Technology Corp.
What Happened
An employee named Stavola filed a wage theft lawsuit against his employer, Macro Digital Technology Corp. During the legal process, Stavola requested documents and information from his employer to support his case. When the company failed to provide these materials, Stavola asked the court to force them to do so.
What the Court Decided
The court sided with Stavola. The judge ordered the company to turn over the requested information and required Macro Digital to pay Stavola $10,038 in attorney fees. This money compensates Stavola for the cost of hiring a lawyer to force the company's cooperation. The court denied his request for additional costs.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that courts will hold employers accountable when they try to hide evidence. If a company refuses to provide documents during a wage theft case, workers can ask a judge to step in and force disclosure. Courts can then make employers pay worker's legal fees for this obstruction, discouraging companies from playing games with evidence.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Stavola from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.