Skip to main content

Leishman v. Office of the Govenor

W.D. Wash.August 29, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01363
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliation

Outcome

Court granted in part and denied in part the defendants' motion to dismiss. The discrimination claims survived the motion to dismiss, but the retaliation claims were dismissed because the defendants (union) lack control over the plaintiff's work schedule.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Member Wins Partial Victory in Discrimination Case** This case involved a worker who sued their union, the Cuyahoga Community College Chapter of the American Association of University Professors, claiming discrimination and retaliation. The employee alleged the union treated them unfairly based on protected characteristics and then retaliated against them for complaining about this treatment. The court issued a mixed ruling on the union's request to throw out the case entirely. The judge allowed the discrimination claims to move forward, finding they had enough merit to proceed to trial. However, the court dismissed the retaliation claims, explaining that the union doesn't have enough control over the worker's job duties and schedule to be held responsible for workplace retaliation. This decision matters for workers because it clarifies that unions can be held accountable for discrimination against their own members. However, it also shows there are limits to what unions can be blamed for - they can only be sued for retaliation if they actually have power to affect your working conditions. Workers facing union discrimination should focus on claims where the union has direct control and influence.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.