Skip to main content

Myers v. Adam's Smokehouse, LLC

E.D. Mo.September 3, 2025No. 4:25-cv-00860
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Outcome

The court reversed and remanded the ALJ's decision denying disability benefits, finding error in the ALJ's evaluation of the plaintiff's subjective allegations regarding migraine headaches and failure to properly apply the two-step framework required by Social Security Ruling 16-3p.

What This Ruling Means

**Myers v. Adam's Smokehouse: Court Orders New Review of Disability Benefits Denial** This case involved a worker who applied for disability benefits due to migraine headaches that prevented them from working. An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) initially denied the benefits application, but the worker appealed this decision to a higher court. The court found that the ALJ made significant errors when reviewing the case. Specifically, the judge failed to properly evaluate the worker's own testimony about how severe their migraine headaches were and how these headaches affected their ability to work. The court also determined that the ALJ didn't follow the required legal procedures for assessing disability claims, particularly rules about how to evaluate a person's subjective reports of pain and limitations. As a result, the court reversed the denial and sent the case back for a new review with proper procedures. This ruling matters for workers because it reinforces that disability benefits decisions must be thorough and fair. When applying for disability benefits, workers have the right to have their personal accounts of pain and limitations taken seriously and evaluated according to established legal standards. If these procedures aren't followed correctly, workers can successfully appeal unfavorable decisions.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.