Skip to main content

Walker v. Deputy Schreiber (51745)

D. Or.September 16, 2025No. 1:25-cv-01434
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Oregon

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

Plaintiff's complaint was dismissed with prejudice under Rule 12(b)(6) because the action was time-barred under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act's two-year statute of limitations. Plaintiff discovered the alleged violation on June 10, 2015, but did not sue the defendant until June 2019, well past the June 2017 deadline.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Dismisses Worker's Case for Filing Too Late** Walker sued Deputy Schreiber claiming discrimination at Visa USA, Inc. However, the case was actually about a violation of credit reporting laws under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, not traditional workplace discrimination. The court threw out Walker's lawsuit entirely because it was filed too late. Under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, workers have only two years from when they discover a violation to file a lawsuit. Walker discovered the alleged problem on June 10, 2015, which meant the deadline to sue was June 2017. However, Walker didn't file the lawsuit until June 2019 - nearly two years past the deadline. The judge dismissed the case "with prejudice," meaning Walker cannot refile it later. **What this means for workers:** Timing is critical when filing employment-related lawsuits. Different laws have different deadlines, and missing these deadlines usually means losing your right to sue permanently. If you believe your employer has violated your rights, it's important to act quickly and understand what time limits apply to your specific situation. Keep detailed records of when violations occur, as this date often starts the clock on filing deadlines.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.