Skip to main content

The Annuity, Welfare and Apprenticeship Skill Improvement & Safety Funds of the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 15, 15A, 15C & 15D, AFL-CIO v. J&A Concrete Corp.

E.D.N.Y.September 17, 2025No. 1:25-cv-02278
Plaintiff WinJ&A Concrete Corp.$127,321.54 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court granted plaintiffs' motion for default judgment against J&A Concrete Corp. for failure to pay ERISA-mandated contributions to union benefit funds. The defendant did not respond to the lawsuit, and the court entered judgment for $127,321.54 including principal contributions, interest, liquidated damages, and attorneys' fees.

What This Ruling Means

Court Rules Against J&A Concrete Corp. for Unpaid Worker Benefits

What Happened

A union benefits fund sued J&A Concrete Corp. for failing to pay required contributions into retirement and welfare programs for operating engineers. These contributions are mandatory payments employers must make to union benefit funds that provide healthcare, pensions, and other worker protections. J&A Concrete did not respond to the lawsuit or defend itself in court.

What the Court Decided

The court sided with the union fund and ordered J&A Concrete to pay $127,321.54. This amount included the unpaid contributions, interest on late payments, penalties, and attorneys' fees.

Why This Matters for Workers

This case demonstrates that courts will enforce employer obligations to fund worker benefits. When employers skip these required payments, workers lose access to healthcare, retirement savings, and other protections they've earned. The substantial penalty—including interest and attorney fees—sends a message that such violations are costly, potentially discouraging other employers from similar non-compliance.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.