Skip to main content

Whiting-Turner Contracting Company v. Laborers' District Council Pension and Disability Trust Fund No. 2

D. Md.September 23, 2025No. 1:24-cv-02250
Plaintiff WinWhiting-Turner Contracting Company$2,682,477.02 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

Whiting-Turner prevailed in arbitration and the court confirmed the arbitration award requiring the Fund to repay $2,187,966.00 in withdrawal liability payments plus $494,511.02 in interest. The arbitrator found that WT did not continue or resume work of the type requiring contributions under the construction exemption to ERISA's withdrawal liability requirements.

What This Ruling Means

**Construction Company Pension Dispute Remains Unresolved** This case involved a dispute between Whiting-Turner Contracting Company, a construction firm, and a union pension fund called the Laborers' District Council Pension and Disability Trust Fund No. 2. The disagreement centered on the company's obligations to pay into workers' pension and disability benefits funds, which are governed by federal employment law known as ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act). The court was unable to resolve this dispute, leaving the matter unresolved without determining whether the construction company properly fulfilled its pension contribution requirements or violated federal benefit laws. This case highlights an important issue for workers in unionized construction and other industries: employers are legally required to make promised contributions to employee benefit funds. When disputes arise over these payments, it can create uncertainty about workers' retirement security and disability protections. While this particular case didn't reach a final decision, it demonstrates how complex pension obligation disputes can become and why workers should stay informed about their employers' contributions to their benefit plans. Workers covered by union benefit funds should monitor whether their employers are meeting their contribution obligations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.