Skip to main content

Maryland Attorney General Opinion 98 OAG 114

MDAGNovember 21, 2013No. 98 OAG 114
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

An Attorney General opinion advising that the University of Maryland Medical Center is exempt from the NLRA, is not currently covered by Maryland's collective bargaining law, but that the General Assembly could add it to the list of State entities subject to Maryland collective bargaining protections if it chose to do so.

Excerpt

Labor law - Public Agencies and Entities - NLRA - General Assembly May Add the University of Maryland Medical Center to List of Entities Subject to Maryland Collective Bargaining Law

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** This wasn't actually a court case, but rather a legal opinion issued by the Maryland Attorney General in 1998. The question involved whether the University of Maryland Medical Center could be included under Maryland's collective bargaining law, which gives workers the right to form unions and negotiate as a group with their employer. **What the Court/Attorney General Decided:** The Attorney General concluded that the Maryland General Assembly (the state legislature) has the authority to add the University of Maryland Medical Center to the list of public entities that must follow Maryland's collective bargaining rules. This means the legislature could require the medical center to recognize and negotiate with employee unions if it chose to do so. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This opinion is significant because it clarifies that state lawmakers can expand union rights to more public sector workplaces. For workers at institutions like university medical centers, this could potentially open the door to collective bargaining rights - meaning they could form unions to negotiate for better wages, benefits, and working conditions. However, the actual expansion of these rights would still require the legislature to take action to formally include these workplaces under the collective bargaining law.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.