Skip to main content

Marshall v. Mark Anthony Brewing, Inc.

D.S.C.September 30, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00877
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
445 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court granted summary judgment motions for all defendants (Medical Intake Nurse, Medical Intake Supervisor, and SAPD Officer John Arevalo), dismissing the plaintiff's deliberate indifference and excessive force claims.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Marshall filed a lawsuit against several defendants including a medical intake nurse, medical intake supervisor at University Health (formerly Bexar County Hospital District), and San Antonio Police Officer John Arevalo. Marshall claimed the defendants showed deliberate indifference to his medical needs and used excessive force against him during what appears to have been a medical intake situation involving law enforcement. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled in favor of all defendants by granting their summary judgment motions. This means the court found that Marshall failed to present enough evidence to support his claims of deliberate indifference and excessive force. The case was dismissed without going to trial, and Marshall received no compensation. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights the challenges individuals face when bringing claims against medical staff and law enforcement officers. It shows that courts require strong evidence to prove deliberate indifference to medical needs or excessive force. For workers in healthcare or public safety roles, this ruling demonstrates that courts will dismiss cases where plaintiffs cannot present sufficient evidence to support their claims, even in situations involving medical care and police interactions.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.