State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Pfeifer, J.
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The Ohio Supreme Court reversed the dismissal of the Liposchak complaint and remanded for further proceedings, holding that dependency issues are not appealable under R.C. 4123.512, but that a decedent's estate can collect R.C. 4123.60 compensation that accrued but was unpaid before the employee's death.
Excerpt
Workers' compensation—Although death benefits may be granted or denied based on dependent status as defined in R.C. 4123.59, the denial or grant of benefits is not appealable unless it concerns the causal connection between injury, disease, or death and employment—R.C. 4123.60 dependency issues are not appealable under R.C. 4123.512—Decedent's estate can be entitled to R.C. 4123.60 compensation that accrued but was not paid to the decedent.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.