Skip to main content

State ex rel. Moss v. Ohio State Hwy. Patrol Retirement Sys.

OhioNovember 6, 2002No. 2002-0750Cited 18 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals' grant of a writ of mandamus, ordering the Ohio State Highway Patrol Retirement System to consider Moss's application for disability retirement benefits despite his employment termination occurring after he applied but before the board made its determination.

Excerpt

Ohio State Highway Patrol Retirement System—Retirement board determined that it was unable to consider an application for disability retirement benefits because the applicant's employment was terminated and he was not an employee of the Ohio State Highway Patrol—Under R.C. 5505.18 and 5505.20, an employee of the Ohio State Highway Patrol who is a member of the retirement system is eligible for disability retirement benefits if the employee applies for those benefits before being terminated—Court of appeals' grant of a writ of mandamus ordering the retirement system and its board to vacate its order determining that it was unable to consider claimant's application and ordering them to conduct further proceedings to determine claimant's eligibility for disability retirement benefits affirmed.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** David Moss, a former Ohio State Highway Patrol employee, applied for disability retirement benefits while he was still employed. However, his employment was terminated before the retirement board could review his application. The retirement system then refused to consider his disability benefits application, claiming they couldn't review it because he was no longer an employee when they made their decision. **What the Court Decided** The Ohio Supreme Court ruled in Moss's favor. The court ordered the retirement system to review his disability benefits application, even though he had been terminated by the time they considered it. The key factor was that Moss had applied for the benefits while he was still employed, which met the legal requirement under Ohio law. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling protects workers who apply for disability retirement benefits before leaving their jobs. It establishes that retirement systems cannot refuse to consider valid applications simply because an employee's job ends during the review process. Workers can feel more secure knowing that if they properly apply for disability benefits while employed, their applications must be reviewed regardless of what happens to their employment status afterward. This prevents employers or retirement systems from using timing technicalities to deny legitimate benefit claims.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.