Skip to main content

Polanco

S.D.N.Y.September 30, 2025No. 1:23-cv-01525
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Military appellate court affirmed Lance Corporal Spence's conviction for willful dereliction of duty under Article 92, UCMJ, finding her conviction both legally and factually sufficient after she discarded documents that should have been processed under standard operating procedures.

What This Ruling Means

**Marine Convicted for Not Following Document Procedures** This case involved Lance Corporal Spence, a U.S. Marine who was court-martialed for willful dereliction of duty. She threw away documents that were supposed to be processed according to standard Marine Corps procedures instead of handling them properly as required by her duties. A military appellate court reviewed her conviction and upheld it. The court found that there was sufficient legal and factual evidence to support her conviction under Article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which covers failure to obey orders or regulations. The court determined that Spence deliberately ignored proper procedures when she discarded the documents rather than processing them correctly. **What This Means for Workers:** While this case specifically involves military personnel, it highlights an important principle for all workers: deliberately failing to follow established workplace procedures can have serious consequences. Whether in civilian jobs or military service, employees are expected to carry out their assigned duties according to company or organizational standards. Intentionally disregarding these procedures—especially when it involves important documents or processes—can lead to disciplinary action, termination, or in military contexts, formal charges and conviction.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.