Skip to main content

A.H.D. Houston, Inc. D/B/A Centerfolds; Dwg Fm Inc. D/B/A Splendor; D. Houston Inc. D/B/A Treasures; A.H.D. Houston, Inc. D/B/A Centerfolds; And W.L. York, Inc. D/B/A Cover Girls, Incorrectly Named as A.H.D.Houston, Inc. D/B/A Centerfolds; Dwg Fm Inc.,d/B/A Splendor; D. Texas Investments, Inc. D/B/A Treasures; A.H.D. Houston, Inc. D/B/A Treasures; And W.L. York, Inc. D/B/A Treasures v. Jaime Middleton; Cora Skinner; Jamillette Gaxiola, Jennifer Zharinova; Jessica Hinton; Lina Posada; Lucy Pinder; Paola Canas; Sandra Valencia; Tiffany Toth;Cielo Jean Gibson; Maysa Qui; Elizabeth Turner; Emily Sears; Gemma Lee Farrell and Jaclyn Swedberg

Tex. App.—1st Dist.December 31, 2025No. 01-22-00176-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Trial court granted summary judgment for the Models on their misappropriation and negligence claims, awarding $1,405,000 in damages. On appeal, the appellate court reversed and remanded for new trial on liability and damages due to improper summary judgment on damages and liability issues.

What This Ruling Means

**Employment Dispute at Multiple Houston Strip Clubs** This case involved a group of women who worked at several Houston-area strip clubs, including venues called Centerfolds, Splendor, Treasures, and Cover Girls. The workers brought employment law claims against the companies that owned these establishments. The dispute appears to center on workplace issues common in the adult entertainment industry, though the specific details of their complaints are not clear from the available information. Unfortunately, the court records indicate that this case could not be resolved due to insufficient information being provided. The Texas Court of Appeals was unable to make a determination on the workers' claims, and no damages were awarded to either side. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights the importance of properly documenting and presenting employment claims in court. When workers file lawsuits, they must provide enough evidence and information for courts to make decisions. Without sufficient documentation, even valid workplace complaints may go unresolved. Workers in any industry should keep detailed records of workplace issues and work with experienced attorneys to ensure their cases are properly prepared and presented to have the best chance of success.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.