Skip to main content

Brian Coblentz v. Tractor Supply Company

Tenn. Ct. App.February 20, 2026No. M2023-00249-COA-R3-CV
The AI-generated summary, outcome, and employer details for this ruling are temporarily unavailable while we re-verify them against the court record. The case caption, court, filing date, and the full opinion on CourtListener are unaffected.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Andy D. Bennett
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published

Related Laws

Law associations are unavailable until this record meets our source checks.

Excerpt

This is a premises liability case brought by a sales representative for a product vendor who was injured while in a Tractor Supply store performing his job. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of Tractor Supply. On appeal, this Court affirmed the trial court's decision based upon the conclusion that Tractor Supply was the statutory employer of the sales representative under Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-113(a) and was, therefore, shielded by the exclusive remedy provision of the workers' compensation statutes. The Tennessee Supreme Court granted permission to appeal, concluded that Tractor Supply was not the sales representative's statutory employer, and remanded the case to this Court to consider the pretermitted issues. We have determined that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Tractor Supply on the issue of whether Tractor Supply owed a duty of care to the sales representative. We vacate and remand for further proceedings.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Brian Coblentz v. Tractor Supply Company from the same court.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.