Searcy v. Vilsack
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Judge Jia M. Cobb
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
- State
- District of Columbia
- Circuit
- D.C. Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The trial court granted summary disposition in favor of the insurance company, dismissing the plaintiff's complaint for PIP benefits. The court of appeals affirmed, finding that SDW, a nonresident, was not entitled to PIP benefits under the reformed no-fault act provisions effective June 11, 2019, which excluded nonresidents unless they owned a registered and insured vehicle in Michigan.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.