Doe v. Clark
Case Details
- Citation
- 2026 NY Slip Op 04279
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- 2nd Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The appellate court reversed the trial court in part, granting the defendants' motion to dismiss the intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent retention/training/supervision, and negligence causes of action insofar as based on acts occurring after plaintiff turned 18, and dismissing the demand for punitive damages against Goodyear. However, the court affirmed the denial of the motion to dismiss the hostile work environment claim under Executive Law § 296 based on sex discrimination.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.