Skip to main content

Lax v. City Univ. of N.Y.

N.Y. App. Div.July 15, 2026No. 2024-09664
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Citation
2026 NY Slip Op 04414
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
Circuit
2nd Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationHostile Work Environment

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's order dismissing defendants Perea and Wetzel's second and third cross-claims (First Amendment retaliation and breach of contract) against CUNY for failure to state cognizable causes of action.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Lax v. City Univ. of N.Y. from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.