Skip to main content

Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

9th CircuitMay 8, 2008No. 05-75333, 05-76566Cited 5 times
Defendant WinABX Air, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Roth, Sidney, Thomas, Callahan
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit granted ALPA's petition for review and denied the NLRB's cross-petition for enforcement, reversing the Board's finding that ALPA violated secondary boycott provisions of the National Labor Relations Act.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Victory in Secondary Boycott Case** This case involved a dispute between the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) and ABX Air, Inc., an air cargo company. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) had ruled that ALPA violated federal labor law by engaging in what's called a "secondary boycott" - essentially pressuring other companies to stop doing business with ABX Air as part of their labor dispute. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the union, overturning the NLRB's decision. The court found that ALPA did not actually violate the secondary boycott rules under the National Labor Relations Act. This meant the union's actions were legally protected labor activities, not illegal interference with business relationships. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling strengthens unions' ability to use economic pressure tactics during labor disputes. It clarifies that certain union activities previously considered off-limits may actually be legal under federal labor law. For workers in unions, this decision potentially expands the range of tactics their representatives can use when negotiating with employers or fighting for better working conditions. The ruling reinforces that workers have broader rights to engage in collective action than the NLRB had initially recognized.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.